IEC 60255-151 / IEEE C37.1129 min read

Worked Example: Fixing Grading Failures in the Demo Project — Why Each Fix Moves the Problem Upstream

Follow the Protection Suite's demo project from load to source: the grading check, the Suggest tool, and why the grid-intertie boundary needs a different fix than a bigger TMS.

Scenario

ProjectDemo Project (▶ Demo Project on the start screen), plot reference 0.4 kV
Devices gradedMCB-45 (32 A type C) → MCCB-12 (LSIG, Ir 320 A) → REL-05 (33 kV feeder, IEC VI, 420 A, TMS 0.30) → REL-04 (33 kV incomer, IEC SI, 625 A, TMS 0.25) → REL-01 (400 kV intertie, IEEE EI, 900 A, TD 0.15)
Required margin (CTI)0.3 s, and 0.4 s at the grid intertie boundary

Margins are checked at 2, 3, 5, 8, 12 and 20 times the downstream device's pickup. Hover a cell in the grading table to see the current and both operating times.

Step-by-step calculation

Step 1: Read the grading check as loaded

Pair (upstream / downstream)×2×3×5×8×12×20Result
MCCB-12 / MCB-4525.8428.1828.9314.216.312.27PASS
REL-05 / MCCB-1219.16−0.59−0.030.880.620.35FAIL ×3, ×5
REL-04 / REL-054.770.490.410.450.450.44PASS
REL-01 / REL-043.62−0.20−0.66−0.67−0.61−0.53FAIL ×3…×20

Margins in seconds. Differential REL-02 (87T) is unit protection and is not time-graded.

Step 2: Fix the lowest failing pair first

💡 Suggest on REL-05 / MCCB-12 proposes the smallest TMS that gives 0.3 s at every multiple.

Step 3: Re-check the pair above

REL-05 is now slower, so the incomer above it has less margin.

Step 4: Fix the incomer

💡 Suggest on REL-04 / REL-05:

Step 5: The grid boundary needs judgement, not a bigger TMS

Suggest on REL-01 / REL-04 proposes TD 0.15 → 3.675 (24.5 ×). It would pass, but the margin would become 151.6 s at ×2 and 33.7 s at ×3 — REL-01 would take minutes to clear a fault just above the incomer's pickup. An extremely inverse curve cannot be made to track a standard inverse curve by time dial alone.

Result summary

CheckRequirementActualStatus
MCCB-12 over MCB-45≥ 0.3 sPasses at all multiples✓ PASS
REL-05 over MCCB-12≥ 0.3 sAfter TMS 0.355: ≥ 0.34 s✓ PASS
REL-04 over REL-05≥ 0.3 sAfter TMS 0.272: ≥ 0.33 s✓ PASS
REL-01 over REL-04≥ 0.4 sNeeds a curve/pickup change agreed with the grid operator✗ FAIL
Working from the load end, REL-05 TMS 0.355 and REL-04 TMS 0.272 give at least 0.3 s at every checked multiple. The grid-intertie pair cannot be solved sensibly by time dial; it needs a change of curve type or pickup agreed at the boundary.

Key insight: Grading is a chain: every TMS increase restores one margin and takes it from the next device up. Accept a suggestion only after checking the pair above it and the resulting clearing time at the source.

Try it with your own numbers

Every input in this example is editable in the live calculator — no signup needed.

Open Protection Coordination Suite (full workbench) calculator →

Frequently asked questions

Does Suggest change the pickup or curve?

No. It only changes the TMS (or time dial) of the upstream device, keeping its curve family and pickup. Re-run it if you change either device afterwards.

Why are the margins shown at multiples of the downstream pickup?

Inverse curves of different shapes converge or cross, so a single fault level can hide a failure. The suite also checks the exact maximum fault level when you enter it for the pair.

More in Protection & Relaying

← Back to all worked examples