๐ŸŽ‰ Free launch period โ€” every calculator, every feature unlocked, no account needed, through mid-November 2026. PDF reports carry a watermark for everyone during this period.
NEC Article 43010 min read

Worked Example: Branch-Circuit Sizing for a 25 HP DOL Motor per NEC Article 430

A 25 HP motor's branch circuit sized entirely off its NEC table full-load current, not nameplate โ€” plus checking the voltage dip its direct-on-line start produces at the site's short-circuit capacity.

Scenario

Motor25 HP, three-phase squirrel-cage induction, 460 V
Full-load current sourceNEC Table 430.250
Overcurrent deviceTime-delay fuse
Starting methodDirect-on-line (DOL), locked-rotor current 180 A
System short-circuit capacity5000 kVA
Maximum acceptable starting voltage dip15%

Step-by-step calculation

Step 1: Look up full-load current from NEC Table 430.250 (not nameplate)

NEC Article 430 deliberately requires using the table FLC value for sizing calculations, even if the nameplate current differs slightly โ€” the table value is what standardizes protection coordination across motors of the same rating.

Step 2: Size the branch-circuit conductor ampacity

branchAmpacity = 125% x FLC
1.25 x 34
42.5 A minimum conductor ampacity

Step 3: Size the disconnect and overload protection

disconnect = 115% x FLC overload = 115% x FLC (no high-temp/high-SF marking assumed)
1.15 x 34
Disconnect and overload both = 39.1 A

Step 4: Size the branch-circuit OCPD (time-delay fuse, 'other' motor category)

maxOcpd = 175% x FLC, rounded to standard size
1.75 x 34 = 59.5 A -> standard size
maxOcpd = 60 A (with a 70 A exception ceiling available if 60 A can't start the motor)

Step 5: Find starting current and starting kVA

startKva = โˆš3 x V x Istart / 1000
1.732 x 460 x 180 / 1000
startKva = 143.4 kVA

Step 6: Check the resulting voltage dip against the system's short-circuit capacity

dip% = startKva / (scCapacityKva + startKva) x 100
143.4 / (5000 + 143.4) x 100
dip = 2.79%, well under the 15% limit

Result summary

CheckRequirementActualStatus
Branch-circuit conductor ampacityโ‰ฅ 42.5 A42.5 A (sizing target)โœ“ PASS
Branch-circuit OCPDn/a (this is the sizing result)60 A time-delay fuseโœ“ PASS
DOL starting voltage dipโ‰ค 15%2.79%โœ“ PASS
This 25 HP motor needs a 42.5 A-rated conductor, a 60 A time-delay fuse, and 39.1 A disconnect/overload ratings โ€” and its direct-on-line start produces only a 2.79% voltage dip against this site's strong 5000 kVA short-circuit capacity, so no reduced-voltage starting method is needed here.

Key insight: Every downstream protection figure in this calculation traces back to the single NEC table FLC value (34 A), not the motor's actual nameplate current โ€” this is a deliberate feature of NEC Article 430, not an approximation, since it keeps branch-circuit sizing consistent and predictable across motors of the same horsepower/voltage/phase rating regardless of small manufacturer-to-manufacturer nameplate variation.

Try it with your own numbers

Every input in this example is editable in the live calculator โ€” free, no signup.

Open Motor Calculator calculator โ†’

Frequently asked questions

Why would the same motor need a reduced-voltage starter at a different site?

Voltage dip depends on the ratio between starting kVA and the system's short-circuit capacity at that point โ€” the same 143.4 kVA starting demand against a weaker 1000 kVA system (instead of this example's 5000 kVA) would produce a dip around 12.5%, getting close to the 15% limit, and against an even weaker system could exceed it, at which point a star-delta, soft starter, or VFD start would be needed to reduce starting current.

What's the difference between the 60 A standard OCPD and the 70 A exception ceiling?

NEC 430.52(C)(1)(b) permits going up to a higher percentage of FLC (225% for a time-delay fuse, versus the standard 175%) specifically when the standard-size device genuinely can't carry the motor's starting current without nuisance tripping โ€” it's not a size to default to, but a documented exception to use only when the lower standard size has actually proven insufficient.

More in Motors & Drives

โ† Back to all worked examples